Unfortunately, one of the involved parties specifically requested that he not be brought in. That said, I would never remove another party who was harmed in all of this. Was he attacked or otherwise harmed in any of this?
look, we both know who "one of the involved parties" is, and i'm telling you it'll be fine. graham will behave, but someone important to him was attacked and if that's not direct stake, i don't know what is.
It has nothing to do with his behavior, Miss Shaw. And that is the definition of 'not a direct stake' as he was not directly affected by Lestat's action, and it is Lestat's actions, and the actions taken given Lestat's actions, that are to be discussed. The concerns of a direct participant takes precedence.
I would request that you not make assumptions on the identity of the one who made this request. I have no intention of providing you information as to that person's identity but the facts remain the same.
your inmate keeps going after people he cares about, and nobody gives a crap about stopping him from doing it again. quit being part of the problem and look at the bigger picture here.
Re: text; post-flood
text; post-flood
you can tell your inmate he won't be attacking anyone during the meeting.
Re: text; post-flood
That was not a concern I had regardless.
text; post-flood
Re: text; post-flood
I would request that you not make assumptions on the identity of the one who made this request. I have no intention of providing you information as to that person's identity but the facts remain the same.
text; post-flood
Re: text; post-flood